Master the S-95 Fire Alarm Supervision Challenge 2025 – Ignite Your Success!

Question: 1 / 400

What distinguishes conventional fire alarm systems from addressable systems?

Conventional systems can connect to the internet

Addressable systems can identify the exact location of an alarm activation

Addressable fire alarm systems are designed to identify the exact location of an alarm activation. This is achieved through a system architecture that assigns a unique address to each device within the system, such as smoke detectors, heat detectors, and manual pull stations. When an alarm is triggered, the system can specify which device activated the alarm, allowing for a precise response from emergency personnel. This feature enhances the effectiveness of the overall fire safety plan, as it aids in quickly locating the source of a potential fire risk or emergency, thereby minimizing response time and increasing safety for occupants.

In contrast, conventional fire alarm systems typically operate on a zone system. They do not have the capability to pinpoint which specific device within a zone has been activated; instead, they indicate that an alarm has been triggered within a general area. This limitation can delay response efforts, as additional investigation may be required to determine the exact source of the alarm activation. Thus, the unique addressing capability of addressable systems is a significant advancement in fire safety technology.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Conventional systems require less maintenance than addressable systems

Addressable systems are older and less efficient

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy